How Does it Work?
The False Claims Act allows private persons (known as “relators”) to file a lawsuit against those individuals, businesses and other entities that have directly or indirectly defrauded the federal government. Although the federal government can file its own False Claims Act lawsuit, the true success of the statute has come in cases that were filed by whistleblowers.
How Cases Are Filed
Whistleblowers who bring cases under the False Claims Act must file their Complaints under seal in a United States District Court, and provide a copy of the complaint, as well as a written statement of all material evidence supporting their allegations to the Attorney General of the United States and the local United States Attorney. Because the Complaint is filed under seal, neither the defendants nor the public are aware that a Complaint has been filed. The Complaint remains under seal for 60 days, while the government investigates the whistleblowers allegations. This seal is frequently extended for months or years.
Before the whistleblower’s Complaint becomes public, the government notifies the whistleblower and the Court of whether it will intervene, or become formally involved, in the case. If the government intervenes, it assumes the lead role in litigating the case against the defendant. The whistleblower and his or her attorney remain involved in the case, and often prove to be critical partners to the government’s prosecution of the case. If the government declines to intervene, the whistleblower may continue to litigate the case on his or her own on behalf of the government.
Filing a case under the False Claims Act is complex and there are many substantive and procedural provisions in the law that can adversely impact the success of a qui tam whistleblower’s case. For example, the False Claims Act provides that only the first whistleblower who files a lawsuit raising the defendant’s fraud can continue on behalf of the government, and share in any recovery that might result. In addition, failing to file and serve the Complaint in the manner required by the False Claims Act can result in a dismissal of the whistleblower’s lawsuit. As a result of these and other complex provisions of the False Claims Act, it is critical that whistleblowers seek the assistance of experienced legal counsel who can help ensure their claim is filed and litigated properly and in a manner that protects their rights. Our attorneys have substantial experience in all aspects of False Claims Act litigation, having represented qui tam whistleblowers under the False Claims Act for twenty years.
Damages Owed By the Defendant
Defendants who are found to have violated the False Claims Act are required to pay the federal government three times the amount of damages sustained by the government and civil penalties of between $5,500 and $11,000 for each false or fraudulent claim. For false claims made on or after August 1, 2016, the civil penalties increase to between $10,781 to $21,563 per false claim. In addition to these damages and penalties, violations of the False Claims Act can trigger a host of potential collateral consequences for defendants, such as disqualification from all future federal and state government contracts.
Whistleblower’s Potential Reward
As a reward for reporting fraud, the whistleblower is awarded a share of 15% to 30% of any recovery that the government receives under the False Claims Act. A number of factors can impact the precise share that a whistleblower receives in any given case. Although there is no precise formula applied in every case, the more that a whistleblower and his or her counsel contribute throughout the case the greater the chances are that the whistleblower will be able to advocate for receiving a larger share of the government’s recovery. In addition to a share of the government’s recovery, the whistleblower is entitled by the False Claims Act to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, to be paid by the Defendant.
Statute of Limitations
Potential whistleblowers should carefully consider that the False Claims Act contains a statute of limitations which may be as short as six years. Statutes of limitations are important in all cases because they can impact whether claims can be brought under the False Claims Act. The calculation of the statute of limitations can be complex and is best done with the advice of experienced qui tam whistleblower counsel.
How You Can
Make a Difference
To take the first courageous step, talk to our attorneys privately.Contact Us
The lawyers in the national qui tam whistleblower practice of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti have proven, battle tested experience fighting for whistleblowers in federal and state false claims cases. The whistleblower practice group includes five former federal and state prosecutors who have:
- Recovered over $2 billion for federal and state taxpayers
- More than 30 years combined experience representing whistleblowers
- Fought some of the most complex cases brought under federal and state false claims acts
- Litigated against some of the largest companies in the United States
- Represented whistleblowers in federal and state courts across the United States
Some of our current whistleblower cases include:
- United States ex rel. Amy Bergman v. Abbott Laboratories – EDPA
- US ex rel Miller & Metts v. HMA, et. al.
- US, et al, ex rel. Mason, Folstad, and MEMA v. HMA and EmCare
- HDL, BlueWave, and related individuals
- Health Management Associates (HMA)
Some of our successful whistleblower cases include:
Supreme Foodservice AG
St. Barnabas Health
Medco Health Solutions
Community Health Systems, Inc.
MEMA v. HMA
Health Diagnostics Laboratory, Inc.
Bergman v. Abbott Lab
Fresenius Medical Care
Doshi Diagnostic Imaging Services
Cooper Health System
University of Pennsylvania
The Boeing Company
Christiana Care Health System