The Best Whistleblower Lawyers | 30+ Years Fighting For You‎

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP’s has one of the most successful, skilled and widely regarded law firms in the United States representing qui tam whistleblowers under Federal and State false claims acts. For more than 32 years our attorneys have fought on behalf of qui tam whistleblowers across the United States, in many of the most complex and sophisticated cases in the history of the federal False Claims Act.

Our attorneys have served as lead counsel for whistleblowers in false claims lawsuits that have resulted in nearly $2 billion in recoveries for federal and state taxpayers. Some of our attorneys’ successful representations of qui tam whistleblowers in federal and state false claims act cases include:

United States ex rel. Epp v. Supreme Foodservice AG, 10-1134 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $389 million civil and criminal recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Merena v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, 93-5974 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $334 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Monahan v. St. Barnabas Health System, 02-5702 (D.N.J.) (resulting in a $265 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Hunt and Gauger v. Medco Health Solutions, 00-737 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $185 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Lutz v. Berkeley Heartlab, No. 9:14-cv230-RMG (D.S.C.) (resulting in a $100 million jury verdict in favor of federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al. ex rel. Mason v. Community Health Systems, Inc., 12-817 (W.D.N.C.) (resulting in a $98 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. MEMA v. Health Management Associates, Inc., 10-472 (W.D.N.C.) (resulting in a $74.5 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Miller & Metts v. Health Management Associates, Inc., 10-3007 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $55 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Lutz & Webster v. Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. et al., 14-230 (D.S.C.) (resulting in a $47 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. MEMA v. EMCARE, 10-472 (W.D.N.C.) (resulting in a $30 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Bergman v. Abbott Laboratories, 09-4646 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $25 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States ex rel. West and Kane v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., 95-3223 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $16.5 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Novick v. Doshi Diagnostic Imaging, (09-4992) (D.N.J.) (resulting in a $15.5 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Nevyas v. Allergan Inc., 09-432 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $13 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States & State of New Jersey ex rel. DePace v. Cooper Health System, et al., 08-5626 (D.N.J.) (resulting in a $12.6 Million recovery for federal and New Jersey taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Saunders v. Univ. of Pennsylvania Health System, 97-6747 (E.D.Pa.) (resulting in a $12 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Monahan v. Warren Hospital, 02-5702 (D.N.J.) (resulting in a $7.5 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. James Monahan v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at Hamilton, 02-5702 (D.N.J.), (resulting in $6.35 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Eastmond v. Vortec Corporation, 00-6458 (E.D.Pa) (resulting in a $4.5 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. DiMezza v. The Boeing Company, 2-10-000634 (E.D.Pa) (resulting in a $4.4 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States et al ex rel. Miller & Metts v. Physician’s Alliance Ltd., 14-339 (E.D. Pa.) (resulting in a $4 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States ex rel. Quinnelly v. Piedmont Hospital, 03-1927 (N.D.Ga.) (resulting in a $3.5 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States et al. v. Christiana Care Health System et al., Civ. No. 05-344 (D. Del.) (resulting in $3.3 Million recovery for federal and state taxpayers)

United States ex rel. West & Serra v. CDI et al., 05-0058 (W.D.Wash.) (resulting in a $2.8 Million recovery for federal taxpayers)

United States & State of Texas ex rel. Hudnall v. Rescare, 3:01cv1154-H (N.D.Tex.) (resulting in a $2.15 Million recovery for federal and Texas taxpayers)

Our global qui tam whistleblower practice consists of distinguished former federal prosecutors, United States military prosecutors and state prosecutors. We have tried hundreds of complex criminal and civil cases throughout the United States, against some of the largest companies in the nation.

Our attorneys bring unmatched experience, skill and knowledge to the representation of our qui tam whistleblower clients. We have litigated virtually every issue that can arise in federal and state false claims act lawsuits, and in many instances, our work has helped set the standard for other whistleblower cases across the nation. We have successfully teamed up with federal and state prosecutors and law enforcement agents in many of the most successful false claims act cases in United States history.

Our attorneys are widely recognized as leaders in the representation of whistleblowers in federal and state false claims act cases. We are frequently invited to speak to audiences across the country about federal and state false claims act cases, and they have written numerous national articles and texts on the false claims acts and qui tam litigation. We have also worked for the passage of new state false claims acts, and have advocated for the strengthening of the federal false claims act.

Our global qui tam whistleblower practice is not about filing as many cases as possible. We carefully analyze each case from all angles and work with our qui tam whistleblower clients to investigate leads and to build the strongest case possible before filing a Complaint. We then work arm-in-arm with federal and state prosecutors to aggressively pursue the defendants and to achieve the best result possible for our whistleblower clients and the taxpayers.

Contact one of our

Experienced Attorneys

If you are aware of any person, corporation or entity that you think may be violating the Federal False Claims Act or a State False Claims Act, contact us today.